How Google’s Search Changes Could Disrupt Direct Sales for European Airlines, Hotels, and Retailers
Editor 
In the ever-evolving digital landscape, changes in Google’s search algorithms ripple across various industries, significantly impacting business models and customer acquisition strategies. Recently, airlines, hotels, and retailers in Europe have voiced concerns over modifications in Google’s search results that they fear disproportionately favor large intermediaries and aggregators, consequently compromising their direct sales channels.
Lobbying groups, including Airlines for Europe, hotel associations Hotrec and European Hotel Forum, along with retail federations, have appealed to EU tech regulators to ensure their interests are weighed equally alongside those of dominant online intermediaries. This plea comes amid the enforcement of the Digital Markets Act (DMA), a legislative measure designed to create a fairer digital playing field.
Understanding the Digital Markets Act (DMA)
The Digital Markets Act (DMA) represents a significant policy initiative by the European Union, aimed at promoting fair competition in the digital space. It targets “gatekeepers”—large online platforms with the power to influence market dynamics due to their size and user base. By imposing rules to ensure transparency and equitable treatment, the DMA seeks to foster competition and enhance user choice.
However, European industries argue that these well-intentioned regulations may inadvertently skew market dynamics. Highlighted in their joint letter dated May 22, 2024, the collective fears that DMA’s compliance mechanisms might amplify discrimination against direct service providers in favor of intermediaries. The letter stresses that EU regulators should consider the implications on direct business avenues while evaluating compliance and enforcement.
The Crux of the Concerns: Direct Sales vs. Intermediaries
Technological advances and data-driven marketing have given rise to powerful online intermediaries that can aggregate services from multiple providers, offering users a one-stop-shop experience. Extensively utilized in travel, hospitality, and retail, these platforms—such as online travel agencies (OTAs) or major e-commerce aggregators—often dominate search engine results pages (SERPs).
European firms point out that while these intermediaries contribute to user convenience, their dominance could compromise the visibility and direct sales of individual brands or companies. Google’s March blog post admission that search changes might funnel more traffic to large intermediaries further accentuates these fears. Essentially, if a hotel or airline is consistently outranked by an intermediary in search results, users are more likely to book through the intermediary, potentially increasing costs for the service provider and diminishing their control over the customer relationship.
The European Perspective: Balancing Compliance and Fair Competition
The DMA’s intended goal of protecting smaller market players and enhancing competition inadvertently puts European businesses at risk of being overshadowed. This brings to the forefront complex regulatory challenges:
Ensuring Equal Footing: The regulatory framework needs to ensure that European businesses—hotels, airlines, and retailers—are not systematically disadvantaged compared to major intermediaries. The non-compliance investigations under DMA should holistically assess market impacts beyond third-party fairness, recognizing direct service models.
Enhancing Visibility: Fair placement in search results is crucial. Algorithms should be calibrated to prevent unjust displacement of direct service offerings, which are vital for industry sustainability and customer engagement.
Supporting Direct Channels: Policies should aim to balance between facilitating user choice via intermediaries and enabling robust direct sales channels. This involves mitigating the excessive influence of gatekeepers.
As Airlines for Europe, Hotrec, and other lobbyists assert, the focus must be broadened to encompass the specific challenges unique to service providers. The looming silence from both Google and the EU Commission exacerbates uncertainty, urging for transparent dialogues and inclusive policymaking.
The Imperative for Regulatory Adaptation
While it is clear that regulating Big Tech to foster competition is imperative, the nuanced demands of diverse sectors must be acknowledged to prevent unintended adverse outcomes. The DMA’s trajectory underscores a broader conversation about digital market regulation and its real-world implications. Effective regulation should collaboratively involve tech giants, industry representatives, and policymakers, ensuring a balanced, inclusive, and competitive digital marketplace.
As this dynamic unfolds, industry stakeholders must remain proactive in advocating for regulations that fairly reflect their operational complexities and market realities. The next steps for the European Union’s regulatory agenda will be closely watched, as they set precedents for global digital market governance.
For the latest insights and updates on this evolving narrative, follow The Daily Star’s Google News channel and other reputable sources such as Reuters, Tuoi Tre News, and Business Today.
